Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codehappy.com.br

Giba - Desenvolvedor Full Stack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
odavibatista.com
Davi Batista | Desenvolvedor Full-Stack
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
molandak.dev
SEAN NEV // FULL STACK
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
maciejbaba.dev
Maciej Bąba - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
mohibkhan.com
Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
codedesenvolvimento.com.br 🇧🇷
Code Desenvolvimento
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
anasbelbaz.com
Anas | Full stack developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
shen-dev.com
Shen | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
anandratna.com
Anand Ratna - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
basmaseyam.com
Basma Salem - Senior Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
dineshojha.com
Dinesh Ojha - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
isamchajia.com
Isam Chajia - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
surajgupta.dev
Suraj Gupta - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
garciadrew.dev
Andrew Garcia - Full Stack Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ivinny.com
Vinay - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ricca.dev
Ricky Perera - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
dhcodigo.com.br 🇧🇷
DHCodigo - Desenvolvimento de Sites
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
anjalithawani.com
Anjali | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
connerc.com
Conner C | Full Stack Web Dev
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.