Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codegregg.com

Home — Matt Gregg — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
felicecaricati.com
Felice Caricati — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abruce.me
Alex Bruce — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
sodiqardianto.com
Sodiq Ardianto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
mateusbezerra.com
Mateus Bezerra - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
matiasrotondo.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
3lt.dev
3LT — Software Engineering Studio
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
alexdunne.net
Alex Dunne | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
mashu.dev
Matteo Celani — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
maxasmith.com
Max Smith | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
sokuranton.dev
Anton Sokur - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
amancodes.tech
Aman Gupta | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
artimoy.com
Arti Moysen — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
rodin.dev
Ilia Rodin — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrewhyde.dev
Andrew Hyde · Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
abbilaashat.tech
A T Abbilaash | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
biplavbarua.dev
Biplav Barua | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.