Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codeforshow.com

Senior Web Developer - Daniel Scheff · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
phoneayemin.com
Phone Aye Min | Senior Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
anoy369.com
Anoy Ahmed | Senior Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
kumarcodes.com
Abhishek Kumar - Senior Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
aidanweller.dev
Aidan Weller - Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
phpvibe.com
PHPVibe : Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
felipedamaro.com
Senior Developer - Felipe Damaro
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
ashleyfox.io
Ashley Fox | Senior Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
ashleyfox.dev
Ashley Fox | Senior Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
ankushj.dev
Ankush Joshi | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
ksmasud.com
E-Commerce Web Developer - Masud Kabir
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
masudkabir.com
E-Commerce Web Developer - Masud Kabir
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
matttarter.com
Matt Tarter — Senior Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
dlindegren.com
Daniel Lindegren - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
robreveles.com
Wordpress Expert | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
bobbynaluz.com
Bobby Naluz | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
dobridobrev.com
Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
newvibewebdesign.com
Web Developer - Boulder, CO Area
1 shared topicsweb-development
72match
pjonesdigital.com
Paul Jones - Web Developer - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.