Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codecrafty.com

wackamole0 (Adam Dowling) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
intellpp.com
iPPLab · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
ipplab.com
iPPLab · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
agileos.net
agileos · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
belc.app
belcapp · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
invaryon.com
Invaryon · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
akshchand.com
akshchand (Aksh) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
thesamyar.com
TheSamyar (Samyar_dsi) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
andrewhall.dev
andrewhall (Andrew Hall) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
kuroskin.com
kuroskin (Konstantin Uroskin) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
armedcodes.com
armedcodes · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
insomaniac.dev
insoman1ac (Anton Gorodchanin) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
beepboop.digital
Beep Boop Digital · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
andrewbmccullough.com
andrewbmccullough (Andrew McCullough) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
armsnyder.com
armsnyder (Adam Snyder) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
adamb.me
Brownyman (Adam brown) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
neuspaces.com
neuspaces · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
dodaucy.com
dodaucy · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bignext.ai
bigmusic (BiG) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.