Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codeconsumption.com

Code Consumption · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
erps-codeclub.co.uk 🇬🇧
ERPS Code Club
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
benc.dev
Pulse Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
invadethecode.com
Home | Invade the Code 👽
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kyleconroy.com
Kyle Conroy's Personal Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
newyorkcodeandcoffee.com
NY Code & Coffee
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
themcglonecode.com
The McGlone Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
thenocodeninja.com
The NoCode Ninja
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bhargavpatel.dev
Bhargav Patel – The Code Architect
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
docodethatmatters.com
Do Code That Matters
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
intentionalcode.com
Intentional Code — Intentional Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ngocoder.com
Ngocoder - Code For Fun
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
pickocode.com
PickoCode - One or Zero
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andrewhornstra.com
Niche Content for No One
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
gromanov.com
Mom's spaghetti code 🍝
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
rocco.dev
RoccoDev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mauicode.com
Maui Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
rockiespetsupply.com
James Gray — Simple code for complex problems
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
piledev.com
I Read Some Code - A quiet space for good software.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.