Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codecoke.com

Hela, I’m Murhy Wst 👋 | codecoke · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
kyleabreu.com
Kyle Abreu
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alfonsnilsson.com
Alfons Nilsson
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
2daysnews.net
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
clinicahmz.com
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
rohankataria.com
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alfonsoce11.dev
Alfonso Espino
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
felixmainville.com
Felix Mainville
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
themiiyadk.com
themiya — portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adarshd.dev
Adarsh Divakaran | Portfolio - REPL
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
maxge.dev
Maxfield
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bluehood.dev
home | codekobold.io
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
krishanator.com
Krish Vijayvergia
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
felixreverett.com
Home | felixreverett.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
robonamari.com
Hi , I’m robonamari | robonamari
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kylacodes.com
Kyla Codes
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
boerprod.com
Bohdan Yerokhin | Golang Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
maxcaspar.com
Max Caspar | Code-Gen Projects
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
thepharo.dev
The Pharo Dev: Mastering Objects – Programming through messages
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.