Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codebypete.com

codeByPete | Web Developer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
mathewseal.com
Mathew Seal | Web Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
benoldham.dev
Web Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
fauza.dev
FauZa - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
robinnong.com
Robin Nong | Web Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adityarastogi.dev
Aditya Rastogi | Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
kuemars.com
Kuemars - Web Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
kunkode.com
KunKode | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
rjdev.io
DevForge | Developer Portfolio Template
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
akashpattnaik.dev
Akash - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
rohanakode.dev
Rohan Akode - Web Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
beecher.me
beechbot | web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
matijamaric.com
Matija Marić - Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
arieldiaz.dev
Ariel Diaz - Web Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
pjonesdigital.com
Paul Jones - Web Developer - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
abmdev.net
ABMdev | Software Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
softup24.com
Developer Portfolio | Full-Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
themukund.com
Mukund Haranesha - Web Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
sohamlonkar.com
SoLo developer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.