Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codeaman.dev

Code a Man - Blog & Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
divnectar.com
Sewdohe - Personal Blog & Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
sol-lee.dev
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
l-we.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
gricardov.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
pierrelapolla.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
alexandermckinney.org
My Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
bninformation.com
Site Author – Personal Blog & Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
maxhalfinportfolio.com
Max Halfin | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
bobpham.com
Bob Pham - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewwhitman.com
Andrew Whitman Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
andrewmullins.dev
Andrew Mullins Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
bensonnguyen.com
Benson Nguyen Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
rocky-production.com
Brian Ruiz | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
boger.dev
Sergej Boger - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
masonliu.dev
Mason Liu | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
maxfarver.com
Max Farver | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
roberto-togni.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
coela.dev
Portfolio | S.T.R.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.