Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to codeadventures.com

Code Adventures · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
mazisuta.com
Mazi Studio — IT Adventures
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
cmsimike.com
Mike Megally
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
robertromito.com
Hi. I'm Rob Romito
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
maxitvalue.com
maxITvalue
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
ac5g.net
AC5G.net – My adventures in ham radio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mattpalmerlee.com
Home | Matt Palmerlee
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
mattrudder.com
Matt Rudder | Software Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
roddyezell.com
Roddy Ezell
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
pigsflew.com
Pigsflew.com • Addie GS • Software Developer in Seattle, WA
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
9dev.tech
9 Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
9developers.tech
9 Developers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mattruma.com
Matt Ruma – Thoughts On Software Development and the Power Platform
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
dlaisoft.com
homepage
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
fanaticadventurists.com
Welcome | Fanaticadventurists
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
4rkal.com
4rkal's Dev Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
dizzysolutions.io
Dizzy Solutions
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
robod.dev
Robod
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gregbustamante.com
Greg Bustamante | Learning log and notes on software development and education.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.