similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to coachingforinstructors.com

Coachingforinstructors alternatives & similar sites

Instructional Coaching Resources | Steve Barkley | Video & Articles — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
barkleycoaching.com ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	Instructional Coaching Resources \| Steve Barkley \| Video & Articles	en	education-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
urbaneducationals.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Urban Educational Consultants Private Limited	IN~ en	education-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalcollege.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	The National College \| CPD for Schools, Trusts, Colleges & Nurseries	en	education-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalonlinesafety.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	The National College \| CPD for Schools, Trusts, Colleges & Nurseries	en	education-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalsafeguarding.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	The National College \| CPD for Schools, Trusts, Colleges & Nurseries	en	education-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tessupply.co.uk ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	TES Supply — Specialist School Supplies & Educational Resources UK	GB en	education-industry WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
developingmindsus.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	21st Century Education \| Developing Minds	en	education-industry Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denitascott.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Denita Scott Educational Services, Inc.	en	education-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designedteaching.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	DESIGNED TEACHING - Home	en	education-industry Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cestrading.ae ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Classic Educational Supplies \| Schools, Teachers & Classrooms	AE en	education-industry Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
susan-rodriguez.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Susan Rodriguez – Educational Leadership	en	education-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationaljournals.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	National Journal of Advanced Research	en	education-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
surveiyo.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Surveiyo: Global Collaboration in Higher Education Research \| surveiyo	en	education-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaee.com.au ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	AAEE — Australasian Association for Engineering Education	AU en	education-industry	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swingedcation.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Substitute Teacher Staffing for K-12 Schools \| Swing Education	en	education-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swingeducation.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Substitute Teacher Staffing for K-12 Schools \| Swing Education	en	education-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curriculumsupport.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	The Curriculum Support Guide \| Instruction Partners	en	education-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
hargadononeducation.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Hargadon on Education — The Complete Collection	en	education-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.