Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cnarchdict.com

Glossary of Chinese Architecture – 中國建築詞典 · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
fazayekhaas.com
Special Space – Architecture Studio
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
l2carq.com
L2carq – Architecture & Design Studio
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
gsabd.com
Grayscale Architecture – Master Mind Architecture
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
dogwoodarchitecture.com
DOGWOOD ARCHITECTURE – SUSTAINABLE MODERN VERNACULAR
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
dogwoodarch.com
DOGWOOD ARCHITECTURE – SUSTAINABLE MODERN VERNACULAR
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
arhitect-stoian.com
HADRIAN STOIAN ARCHITECTURE – architecture & consultancy
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
2bnova.com
2B nova – Architects
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
cobbarchitecture.com
Cobb Architecture |
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
mathiashohf.com
Mathias Hohf – Architecture __ Design __ Construction
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
artekassociates.com
artek associates – architecture – research – management
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
mcalarchitecture.com
M.CAL Architecture & Design
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
sojoarchitects.com
SoJo Architects – Architects
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
cubedesignsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cube Design Solutions – Architecture Design Manchester
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
ads-design.net
ADS Design – Architectural Design Services
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
bluelinearchitecture.com
Blueline Architecture
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
coasite.com
Craft of Architecture
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
3citiescollective.com
3 Cities Collective – Architectural Design Services
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
aacarchitecture.org
AAC Architecture
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.