similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cmpublishers.com

Cmpublishers alternatives & similar sites

Nathan Gibbs - Open Source Software Development — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
adimian.net ↗	74 match 3 shared topics	Adimian: Sustainable Python Software Development	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
agilestaffordshire.org ↗	69 match 3 shared topics	Agile Staffordshire » A user group for Agile, XP, Software Craftsmanship and Software Development, based in Stafford	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
overroot.com ↗	68 match 3 shared topics	Muhammad Hasan Khan — Software Engineer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trinnguyen.com ↗	67 match 3 shared topics	Tri Nguyen's Blog · Mobile app development, Kotlin, Swift, Xamarin, KMM	en	programming-languages Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adam-gordon.dev ↗	67 match 3 shared topics	Adam Gordon \| Software Developer - Bachelor of Science in Computer Programming and Information Systems from Farmingdale State College	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trisecode.com ↗	66 match 3 shared topics	Trisecode — Rust Development & Systems Programming Services	en	programming-languages Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ibrahimtmiraj.com ↗	66 match 3 shared topics	Ibrahim T. Miraj \| Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agivigir.tech ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Arthur Givigir \| iOS Developer	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baerbak.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Flexible, Reliable Software	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iandundas.com ↗	65 match 3 shared topics	Ian Dundas - freelance iOS app developer	en	technology-and-computing Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stweep.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	STweep \| The source code formatter for Structured Text	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icodeofficial.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Jayprakash Mandal \| Developer & Creator	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mirzemehdi.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Mirzamehdi Karimov - Android Developer	en	programming-languages Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kylecoder.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Android Dev	en	programming-languages WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kylebashour.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	Kyle Bashour \| iOS Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
minzawmra.com ↗	64 match 3 shared topics	A Software Engineer’s Reflections \| A software engineer’s reflections on moving fast, engineering principles and practices	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devdogsuga.org ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	DevDogs	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chaosinmotion.com ↗	63 match 3 shared topics	Development Chaos Theory \| An on-going conversation about stuff I find interesting	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.