Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cmcorett.com

CM Corett | Author of Gay Romance · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
arlysavery.com
Arlys Avery Author YA romance
2 shared topicsromance
70match
fayrekehoe.com
Fayre Kehoe | Fantasy Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
69match
niamyst.com
Nia Myst - Dark Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
69match
dlieber.com
Fantasy & Romance Author | D. Lieber
2 shared topicsromance
69match
dmsimmons.com
Author D.M. Simmons | Fantasy Romance
2 shared topicsromance
68match
acarthur.net
AC Arthur | Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
68match
ariamazebooks.com
Home | Author Aria Maze
2 shared topicsromance
68match
pipdolyn.com
Pip Dolyn – Queer Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
68match
ariellebitetti.com
Arielle Bitetti Author | Lilith: Book I Dark Fantasy Romance
2 shared topicsromance
67match
arianoirfaylen.com
Author Aria Noir Faylen | dystopian dark romance novels
2 shared topicsromance
67match
cloverholloway.com
Clover Holloway | Author
2 shared topicsromance
67match
ktsargent.com
K. T. Sargent – Fantasy and Sci-fi Romance Author
2 shared topicsromance
67match
belward.net
Home | B.Elward | Author
2 shared topicsromance
67match
fayelennox.com
Faye Lennox — Romance Author & AI Writing Advocate
2 shared topicsromance
67match
maureen-smith.com
Romance, Suspense and Erotic Book Author | Maureen Smith
2 shared topicsromance
67match
rlemesurierauthor.com
Rachel Le Mesurier: Historical Romance Author | Rachel Le Mesurier Author
2 shared topicsromance
67match
rmbellamy.com
R.M. Bellamy | Author
2 shared topicsromance
67match
robertkenyon-author.com
Robert Kenyon: Romance Author | ROBERT KENYON AND HEADLINE LOVE
2 shared topicsromance

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.