Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to clivelane.com

Clive Lane, Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
billchandos.dev
Bill Chandos - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
krislito.com
Kris Lito | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewgordon.dev
Andrew Gordon | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
fibuklarx.com
Wahid Aliyar | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ankurraj.tech
Ankur Raj | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ktleary.com
Kevin Leary — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
maxluong.dev
Max Luong | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
arjundhaliwal.com
Arjun Dhaliwal | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
fathiputera.com
Fathi Putera | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
arghadeepdas.com
Arghadeep Das | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
nick-byrne.com
Nicholas Byrne | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
rolandhudak.com
Roland Hudak - Software developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anmolagrawal.dev
Anmol Agrawal - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
arlwinf.com
Arlwin Fajardo | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
djwcomeau.com
David Comeau — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
fares-dev.com
Fares Mohamed — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
bibekstha.me
Bibek Shrestha - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.