similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to climbingmountimprobable.com

Climbingmountimprobable alternatives & similar sites

Climbing Mount Improbable | Discovery Institute — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
darwinsheretic.com ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	Darwin’s Heretic \| Discovery Institute	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deveber.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	deVeber Institute	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
europeanmicrobiomeinstitute.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	European Microbiome Institute - EMI	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daniellabtulane.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Daniel Lab \| Tulane Brain Institute	en	science Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darwindinosaurs.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Darwin & Dinosaurs – Explore, Discover, Learn	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dandrite.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	DANDRITE - Danish Research Institute of Translational	en	science TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
remiza.ai ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Remiza — Independent Research Institute	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0ctopus.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	INSTITUTE FOR TRANSHUMANIST CEPHALOPOD EVOLUTION - Miriam Simun's Portfolio	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
europeanastrobiology.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	European Astrobiology Institute – Taking Research, Training and Education in Astrobiology to new frontiers	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bashanis.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Bashan Institute of Science – Science and technology for the benefit of mankind	en	biological-sciences WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bretweinstein.net ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Dr. Bret Weinstein	en	biological-sciences Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darwinspigeons.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Welcome \| darwinspigeons.com	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
henneberger-lab.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Synaptic and glial plasticity lab \| Institute of Cellular Neurosciences I, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Germany	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
darwins-galapagos.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Darwin's Galapagos – "If there is the slightest foundation for evolution, the zoology of the Galápagos will be well worth examining…." — Charles Darwin	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fasanolab.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	FasanoLAB – New sustainable pathways in organic synthesis	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
renskevroomans.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Renske Vroomans	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reportera.io ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Reportera— Professional Lab Reports Instantly	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hellonewmanlab.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Newman Lab Tufts Neuroscience \| Tufts Neuroscience	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.