similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to climatecorner.org

Climatecorner alternatives & similar sites

The Climate Corner – Dr. Sara Via, svia@umd.edu — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
climanosco.net ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Climanosco – Climate Science for Everyone	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climateattribution.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Home - Climate Attribution	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hi-consulting.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Climate Uncovered \| Tom Harris \| Substack	United Kingdom en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climate-cryosphere.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Climate and Cryosphere – Understanding our changing cryosphere and its climate connections	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climatecycleanalysis.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Climate Cycles Analysis	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climatechangereconsidered.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Climate Change Reconsidered – Climate Change Reconsidered	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adac-alliance.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ADAC – The Doctoral Alliance for Climate Adaptation.	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ian-morse.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Ian Morse – Mining and Climate and Science	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climateaudit.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Climate Audit	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climate101.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Climate Change: Fitting the Pieces Together	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
milkandclimate.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Cows Milk and Climate, authored by Prof Dr Peer Ederer	en	environment TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climatereaction.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home • Climate Policy for Scientists	en	environment Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climate-lab-book.ac.uk ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Climate Lab Book \| Open climate science	United Kingdom en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climate-research-letter.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Climate Research Open Letter	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
douglasbrooks.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Everything You Need to Know About Global Warming and Cooling � Without the Bias	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clarkwx.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Jordan Clark, PhD \| Climatologist & Data Scientist	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climatebell.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Climate Bell - Explaining the truth in climate change. Breakthrough proof Earth's temperature increase is not dominated by rising GHG levels. Instead a reduction in clouds, unrelated to GHGs, is ~85% of the warming.	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
climatechangeeducation.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Climate Change Education .Org – Mobile Climate Science Labs; Videos: Hands-on Demos; Legacy International Web Portal	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.