similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cleancsharp.com

Cleancsharp alternatives & similar sites

Clean C# - Professional C# Development Patterns — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
funxlib.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Funx - Functional Programming Patterns for Elixir	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
24hscripts.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	24hScripts - Premium Developer Snippets	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clean-cpp.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Clean C++ – Clean Software Development with Modern C++	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clean-cpp.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Clean C++ – Clean Software Development with Modern C++	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5thavenuelabs.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	SwiftGuides - Modern Swift & iOS Development	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advancedpython.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Advanced Python Development	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamnengland.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Adam N England – Professional Software Engineer, Amateur Human Being	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stonesoupprogramming.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Stone Soup Programming – Web Development, Explanations, Techniques	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
software-development.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Software Development – Behind the scenes	United Kingdom en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
donnywals.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Donny Wals – Swift and iOS development tutorials, books, and workshops	en	programming-languages WordPress Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
p2sdev.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Passionate Java developer. Developer of JSON to ORMs mapping	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1ob.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Oskar Behzadpour — Student & Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertoisboring.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mindful Development \| A Space for Reflection, Code, and Creativity	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamsorush.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sorush Khajepor - Numerical coding and app development	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dougtodd.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Doug Todd - Flutter Developer	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developingthedeveloper.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Developing the developer - Write clean code and keep it simple.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chaosorganised.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Chaos Organised – Peter Dongan's Software Development Blog	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roblouie.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	roblouie \| Thoughts, ideas, and tutorials on software development. Mostly JavaScript.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.