similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to clawid.dev

Clawid alternatives & similar sites

ClawID - Verification for AI Agent Skills — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
agentid.info ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	AgentID - Verified AI Agent Identities	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
identity.app ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Trusted identity for AI agents \| identity.app	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentoauth.org ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	AgentOAuth – Verifiable Consent for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trizloom.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Izdeg \| Truth level for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
traverselabs.ai ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Traverse Labs - Verifiable Context Transfer for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agent-trust.org ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Agent Trust — Trust Resolution and Verification Infrastructure for Autonomous Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentids.org ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Agent Identity (AID) - Authentication & Authorization for AI Agents \| Open Source	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentsh.org ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	agentsh \| Agent Shell Security for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
idesify.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Idesify — Identity Verification for the Privacy Era	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aflock.ai ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Secure AI Agent Execution \| aflock	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
trendenforceauth.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	EnforceAuth — Authorization for the AI agent era	en	artificial-intelligence Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
labsenforceauth.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	EnforceAuth — Authorization for the AI agent era	en	artificial-intelligence Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clawforce.net ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	ClawForce — Verification API for the Agent Economy	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
idkite.ai ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	IdKite.ai - Secure Identity Verification for Regulated Industries	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentproofs.io ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	AgentProofs — Trust, Observability & Cost Attribution for AI Agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advanced-consulting.london ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	ZKAP \| Cryptographic Verification of Formalized Rules for AI Systems	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
agent-shield.ai ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	AgentShield - AI Agent Governance Platform	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentsign.dev ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	AgentSign -- Zero Trust for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.