similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to claraschaep.com

Clara Schaep — Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

L.S. Redding — Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

byralphcalderon.com

Ralph Calderon — Author

2 shared topicsfiction

juliamaeseales.com

Julia Seales — Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andrewschrader.com

Andrew Schrader — Author & Filmmaker

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

owenmackaman.com

Owen Mackaman — Author

2 shared topicsfiction

ebwainright.com

E. B. Wainwright — Author

2 shared topicsfiction

aarongransby.com

2 shared topicsfiction

acbuxauthor.com

AC Bux | Author of The Sown

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

judysavinar.com

Judy Savinar — Author of Kissing Strangers

2 shared topicsfiction

Lora Jones | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ashleyschaller.com

Ashley Schaller – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

abigailrosemarie.com

Abigail Rose-Marie | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Jules Bakes — author of SEA LEGS

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Asher Cross -Asher Cross — Author

2 shared topicsfiction

holinauthor.com

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

lonnieschaefer.com

Lonnie Schaefer – Children's Book Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

mperegrineburrows.com

Michael Burrows – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

juliansmart.com

Julian Smart, Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.