Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to clapat.com

ClaPat - Creative Portfolio WordPress Themes Carefully Designed · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
62match
namifokote.com
Nami Fokote Creative Agency
5 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
62match
mfldesignstudio.com
MFL | Design Studio
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
59match
diversionarytactic.com
Diversionary Tactic, Inc.
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
56match
anrealdesign.com
AN real design: Digital solutions, Marketing, Branding, UI/UX
4 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
56match
andreanonni.com
Andrea Nonni | UX Designer London UK
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
55match
milenachikalidi.com
Milena's Portfolio
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
55match
fazilali.com
Fazil Ali - Product Designer
1 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
54match
aaronooiweita.com
Aaron Ooi | Lead Product Designer
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
54match
nasgary.com
naeim. portfolio.
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
54match
madebydanda.com
Branding and Web design studio | Danda
2 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
54match
itrendesign.com
iTrend Design | Creative Ideas, Design, Solutions
3 co-citations3 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html
54match
abrahampmathew.com
Abraham - Innovative UX/UI Designer | User-Centered Design Portfolio
2 co-citations4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-design-and-html

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.