similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ckam.net

Ckam alternatives & similar sites

Clarence Kam — Product & General Management Executive — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ronkoskinen.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Ron Koskinen - Product Management Executive	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aipmanagement.org ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	The Academy of Management Executives - US	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamjustinrushing.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Justin Rushing \| Strategic Revenue & Growth Management Executive	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
donnorkett.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Don Norkett \| Product Management	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
labrarf.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Ray Labra \| Product Manager	en	executive-leadership-and-management Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
yshemesh.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Yossi Shemesh - Product Management & Development Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4omoludens.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Homo Ludens \| Executive Alpinism & Risk Management	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pagliocco.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Tony Pagliocco \| Global Product Management Leader \| tonypag.com	AE~ en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trilokyadav.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Trilok Yadav - Product Manager	IN~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ibrahimshardow.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Ibrahim Shardow \| Product Manager	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aboutjared.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jared Konarska — Product Manager (Technical Background)	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medeiros.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Thiago Medeiros Araujo — Executive Product & Technology Leader	GB en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romannalobin.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Roman Nalobin \| Product Manager Portfolio	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
yunusemreyucel.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Yunus Emre Yücel - Senior Product Manager	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
2cs-media.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Lauren Schultz - Product Manager & Content Strategist	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chrisrotsteeg.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Chris Rotsteeg: Design Leadership, UX & Product Management	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
riztabley.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	RizTabley: Project management	en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kyrochen.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Kyro Chen - Product Manager & Analyst	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.