similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cjcd.org

Cjcd alternatives & similar sites

Centar za jačanje civilnog društva - Center for civil society strengthening — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cid.mk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	CID.MK \| Center For Intercultural Dialogue	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stoasociety.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Stoa Society	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developmentsocietyforpoor.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Development Society for Poor	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mintcoop.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	NSPMC Cooperative Society	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enveloply.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	IMARAH CENTER FOR CHANGE - Empowering Communities	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
adunited.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	African Diaspora United: Strengthening Bonds Across Continents	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doroobegypt.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Doroob	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4socialchange.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Center for Social Change - Non Profit coworking & Event Space	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
triple7society.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Triple Seven Society	en	non-profit-organizations Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
africanroots.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	African Roots Worldwide \| Strengthening Trust, Connection & Cultural Intelligence	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icanpeacework.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	International Civil Society Action Network (ICAN)	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dadngo.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	DAD for Human Rights and Civil Society Affairs – Human Rights and Civil Society Affairs	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icfcg.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	International Center for Corporate Governance - Board Foundation	US~ en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
iccg.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	International Center for Corporate Governance - Board Foundation	US~ en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
4everforward.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Forever Forward \| Empowering Fathers, Strengthening Families, Building the Future \| Forever Forward	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
helenbamber.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Helen Bamber Foundation \| Strength to Fly	en	non-profit-organizations Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
epicyouthcenter.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Epic Youth Center — Goldendale, WA	US~ en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fescang.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - FESCA - Foundation for Ethical Society and Cultural Awareness	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.