Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cjburfield.com

My Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
ignaciocab.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
80match
siyuli.dev
Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
75match
nalinporwal.com
Nalin's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
74match
angelicasportfolio.com
Angelica's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
evan-shaw.com
Evan Shaw | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
renepauls.com
René Pauls Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
albertxlynch.com
Albert Lynch Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
andrewreedhall.com
Andrew Hall's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
chazarvizu.com
Chaz's Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
2daysnews.net
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
chauanhtuan.com
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
gmotion.dev
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
kingforadaydesign.com
Simon Panzarino's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
deontevanterpool.com
Deonté Vanterpool | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
derrickhsu.com
Derrick Hsu | Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
arielhammon.net
Ariel Hammon | Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
kierancr.com
Kieran Cripps | Portfolio Shell
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
abdulrehmanchoudhry.tech
Abdul Rehman Choudhry | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.