Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to citeapodcast.com

Podcast Citations · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
andrewtcallaway.com
Podcast Home Page
1 shared topicseducation
69match
acscitationgenerator.com
ACS Citation Generator | Free ACS, APA, MLA Citations
1 shared topicseducation
69match
acesite.net
Academic Citation Explorer
1 shared topicseducation
68match
futureupodcast.com
Home - Future U Podcast
1 shared topicseducation
68match
edanswerkey.com
The Ed Answer Key Podcast
1 shared topicseducation
66match
2e-learning.com
Exceeds Expectations Learning
1 shared topicseducation
65match
courseanddissertation.com
Course & Dissertation
1 shared topicseducation
65match
jrdfoundation.com
JRD Foundation
1 shared topicseducation
65match
reference-analyzer.com
Reference Analyzer - Analyze Academic Citations & Check Journal Rankings
1 shared topicseducation
65match
referyze.com
Reference Analyzer - Analyze Academic Citations & Check Journal Rankings
1 shared topicseducation
65match
carolynskibba.com
Carolyn Skibba - Presentations
1 shared topicseducation
65match
mr-romero.com
UTRGV M.Ed. in C&I Program E-portfolio | Notion
1 shared topicseducation
65match
accuratepublications.com
Accurate Publications
1 shared topicseducation
65match
educationdatatracker.com
Education Data Center
1 shared topicseducation
64match
acdroi.org
ACDROI - Academic Citation & Digital Research Object Identifier
1 shared topicseducation
64match
burntouteducator.com
Home - Burnt Out Educator Podcast
1 shared topicseducation
64match
caastedu.com
Home - CAAST Education
1 shared topicseducation
64match
achonu.org
ACHONU Foundation
1 shared topicseducation

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.