similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cihanartunc.com

Cihanartunc alternatives & similar sites

Cihan Artunç – Associate Professor of Economics, Middlebury College — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Economy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mirogabrovski.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Miroslav Gabrovski \| Associate Professor of Economics, University of Hawaii Manoa	United States~ en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kurtlavetti.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Kurt Lavetti, Professor of Economics, The Ohio State University	United States~ en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mingyaoxu.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Derrick Xu \| Assistant Professor of Economics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trfetzer.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Thiemo Fetzer – Professor of Economics	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
christian-proano.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Christian R. Proaño \| University Professor of Economics, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rolandrathelot.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Roland Rathelot – Professor of Economics, ENSAE, IP Paris, and CREST	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
christianbjoernskov.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	christianbjoernskov.com \| Professor of Economics	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clarkhoskin.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Clark Hoskin – Tourism and Economic Development Professional	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
epberman.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Elizabeth Popp Berman – Professor of Organizational Studies, University of Michigan	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
palestinedatastore.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Institute for Social and Economic Progress	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owenhearey.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Owen Hearey - PhD Candidate in Economics	United States~ en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kwasnica.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Tony Kwasnica Economist	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deveconomicsinstitute.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Deveconomics	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fscheifele.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Fabian Scheifele – Economist	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cymyngrant.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Simon Grant – ANU Economist \| A site I had to create because Dropbox "dropped" the ball.	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designeconomics.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Design Economics Podcast with Vinny Tafuro	en	economy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
claasmertens.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Claas Mertens – I research geoeconomics — international economic conflict, weaponized interdependence, and the political economy of climate regulation. I am a Research Fellow at the University of Oxford's Blavatnik School of Government and a Junior Research Fellow of Worcester College,	en	economy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rmannecon.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	RMann Economics - Home	en	economy Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.