similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to cialog.com

Cialog alternatives & similar sites

cialog | corporate interactive design — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
corporateidentity-unternehmen.de ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Corporate Design Agentur • Narciss & Taurus	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
corporatedesign-b2b.de ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Corporate Design Agentur • Narciss & Taurus	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
studioelbglanz.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	CORPORATE CONCEPTS, BRAND ENGINEERING & DESIGN - Studioelbglanz	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dieserkoch.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Start - Markenbaukasten - Grafikdesign für Gründer	Germany de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diggi-work.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Diggi Work – Konzeption und Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentur-khor.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Agentur KHOR: Digitale Branding und Design Agentur	de	design Statamic	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
die-isarkreativen.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	DIE ISARKREATIVEN – Agentur f. Design u. Kommunikation in München	Germany de	design TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designstudio-seidl.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Startseite - Designstudio Seidl	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studio-linkmann.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Studio Linkmann – Agiles Designstudio für Strategie & Branding	de	design Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
accuratio-design.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Accuratio Design - Präzision für Marke, Marketing und digitale Innovation	Germany~ de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
miscion-design.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Freelance Design & Art Direction by Nathalie Misczychowski	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designverign.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Shopware Düsseldorf, Design, E-Commerce \| designverign GmbH	Germany~ de	design Concrete5	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
g31design.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	g31 – Design und Branding Agentur aus Düsseldorf	de	design Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
360plus.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	360plus Design GmbH München \|	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
studioaugspurger.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Studio Augspurger \| Product Identity Marketing für Interior Design Brands	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corepixel.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	corepixel – Kreatives Studio für strategisches Markendesign – Wir sind ein strategisches Design- und Kreativstudio mit Sitz in Wedel bei Hamburg. Spezialisiert auf Branding, Corporate Design und Markenkommunikation.	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cubemedienagentur.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	cubemedia design – Konzeption.Design.Werbung	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deichstuermer-media.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesign aus dem Landkreis Stade - Deichstürmer Media	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.