Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chrisseaton.com

Chris Seaton · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
chrisanaya.com
CHRIS ANAYA
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
chrisamanse.com
Chris Amanse
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
chstoumpos.com
Chris Stoumpos's blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
chrispad.com
Chrispad
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
chrispado.com
Chris Pado - blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
chrisdone.com
Chris Done's Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
ckruf.com
Christian Kruf
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrisipacs.com
Chris' Java blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrisdeso.com
Where | chrisdeso
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chriskant.com
Chris Kant - Software Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrisphan.com
chrisphan.com: Main
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
antoniomartinezarias.com
Aton143
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrisgiampietro.com
Christopher Giampietro
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ckriley.com
Chris Riley | Adventures of a Programmer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
christopherthiebaut.com
index | christopherthiebaut.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
christianalfoni.com
christianalfoni - developer blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
betweentwoparens.com
Between Two Parens
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
chrissvec.com
Chris Svec – Software Engineering Leader, Embedded Software Geek, and All-Around Nice Guy
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.