Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chrisnajafi.com

Christopher Najafi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
justhack.com
Christopher Saylor
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
thebluepolicebox.com
Christopher Warrington
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrewchristman.com
Andrew Christman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
astuteape.com
Wade Christensen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
hivoltg.com
Christopher Harris | Critical Environments Operator & Data Center Technician
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
calebevans.me
Caleb Evans | Coder for Christ
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
alexchristie.dev
alex christie | home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
c2itllc.com
Chris Carr
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cpcwood.com
Chris Wood
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
achrispratt.com
achrispratt
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
advisedbyshort.com
Chris Short
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
acohimself.com
Andreas Christian Olsen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mrvoxel.com
Chris Gibson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
juliancanderson.com
Julian Christian Anderson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
actition.com
Christian Wenz - christianwenz.de
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
sileschristian.com
Christian Siles - Product Designer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
simplephilosopher.com
Simple Philosopher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
c-o.dev
chris ~ corinthians
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.