Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chrisleibee.com

Portfolio | Christopher Leibee · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
ashhal.tech
Portfolio | AV
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
chomieu.com
Portfolio | Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ethannayak.com
Portfolio | Ethan Nayak
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
nathaniel.ai
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
esterbenedit.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
manak.dev
Portfolio | Manak Pandey
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
abhishek-kashyap.com
Abhishek Kashyap - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
abhisheksachan94.com
Portfolio | Creative Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
derekslo.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
nalmeel.com
Naser Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
paskie.dev
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
alaynalusky.tech
Software Engineer Portfolio | Alayna Lusky
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
asitename.net
Portfolio Of Ali
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
khuedoan.dev
Portfolio - Minh
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
ashutoshchauhan.me
Portfolio | Ashutosh Chauhan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
beverlyqin.com
Beverly Qin - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bferns.com
Ben Ferns - Portfolio Site
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
pauljsalter.com
The Portfolio of Paul Salter
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.