Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chrisdover.com

Chris Dover — Founder Build Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
andycquach.com
Andy Quach — Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
71match
riaankumar.com
Riaan Kumar — Founder & Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
70match
andrewng.com
Andrew Ng — MVP Builder for Founders
1 shared topicsstartups
70match
the-farre.com
Faris Švrakić — Product Builder & Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
70match
manavpurswani.com
Manav Purswani — Founder, Builder, Student
1 shared topicsstartups
70match
3rdcof.com
3rd Cofounder — Home
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
rickyfunk.com
Ricky Funk — Founder & Product Manager
1 shared topicsstartups
69match
alex-thomas.org
Alex Thomas - Building with Founders
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
bharatangra.com
Bharat Angra - Founder & Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
arunkumar.me
Arun Kumar — Founder. Mentor. Author.
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
asad-khan.net
Asad Khan | Entrepreneur • Founder • Brand Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
chenshaokun.com
Shawn Chen Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
igoryuzovitskiy.com
Igor Yuzovitskiy | Product Builder & Founder
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
angeloasante.com
Angelo Asante — Founder & SWE
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
deonchingwe.com
Deon Davies Chingwe | Founder & Builder
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
euniceawoyemi.com
Eunice – Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
evpav.com
Evgeny Pavlov — Founder & Global Citizen
1 shared topicsstartups
68match
andjelakanjo.com
Andjela Kanjo - Builder, Founder, Engineer
1 shared topicsstartups

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.