Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chrisdone.com

Chris Done's Homepage · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
skyejonke.com
Skye Jonke's Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
arsdnet.net
Adam D. Ruppe's homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
rememberedfrequency.com
Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
skyleraikin.com
Skyler Aikin's Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
kinqq.com
Kinqq | Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
chaseklake.com
Chase Lake - homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
paulmueser.com
Paul Müser | Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
reneeverly.com
Renée Waverly - Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
pault.com
Paul Tchistopolskii homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
androidsoong.com
Doug Mason's Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alandonovan.net
Alan Donovan | Alan Donovan’s home page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
develpeer.com
Home | Develpeer’s Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
checkboxhuman.com
PageMotor Theme Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
paulhoule.com
Paul Houle home page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
anotherconstruct.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pavithrabasiccoding.com
Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
digitaldan.co.uk 🇬🇧
DigitalDan - Home Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
evie-anderson.com
evie's page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.