Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chrisdeso.com

Where | chrisdeso · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
christopherthiebaut.com
index | christopherthiebaut.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
chrispad.com
Chrispad
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrisanaya.com
CHRIS ANAYA
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrisamanse.com
Chris Amanse
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrisseaton.com
Chris Seaton
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrisipacs.com
Chris' Java blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
chrispado.com
Chris Pado - blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
chrisphan.com
chrisphan.com: Main
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
chrisdone.com
Chris Done's Homepage
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
chstoumpos.com
Chris Stoumpos's blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
chrisgiampietro.com
Christopher Giampietro
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
deveel.com
Where .NET Open Source Grows | deveel.org
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
ifnotnil.com
If Not Nil
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
afanasev.net
afanasev.net | Boring coding
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
devrocket.io
Dev Rocket | Code Your Future | Preston Wallace | Dev Rocket
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
chriskant.com
Chris Kant - Software Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
excellenceofcode.com
Excellence of code | Computer coding
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
ahmadshahwan.com
Ahmad SHAHWAN
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.