Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chrisdavidmiles.com

Chris David Miles · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
edavidaja.com
E. David Aja
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
68match
mulatti.com
David Mulatti
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
67match
sirdavidoflee.com
Sir David of Lee
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
ebukas.com
David Achibiri
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
burke.io
Chris W. Burke
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
66match
luisdavidjm.com
Portfolio - Luis David Jimenez Martinez
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
acdavid.com
david abakelia-chartia
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
cadenchristensen.com
Home - Caden Christensen
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
2-strange.com
Christina Strong
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
65match
juandavidrojas.com
Juan David Rojas | Desarrollador
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
rehler.com
David Rehler's Home Page
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
abrnk.com
David Abranka | Freelance Web Developer & Designer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andydavies.net
Andy Davies – Web Performance Consultant
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andydavies.me
Andy Davies – Web Performance Consultant
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
butterworth.dev
Chris Butterworth's e-Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
7milewebstudio.com
7 Mile Web Studio
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
64match
fromtheoutfit.com
The Outfit: Professional Web Developers
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
owendavis.dev
Owen Davis's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.