Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chjournal.com

Chapter House Journal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
demosjournal.com
demos journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
chapterfive.com
Chapter 5
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
destolfe.com
de Stolfe Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
chapternaut.com
chapternaut | Reading Log & Book Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
asterixjournal.org
- Aster(ix) Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
apogeejournal.org
Home – Apogee Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
nabokovonline.com
Nabokov Online Journal - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
gogibear.com
gogibear | Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
archetypemag.com
Home | Archetype: A Literary Journal
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
chapterhut.com
ChapterHut
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
texasbookjournal.com
Texas Book Journal - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
illuminatejournal.com
ILLUMINATE JOURNAL - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
alexanderstille.net
Alexander Stille - Writer and Journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
adventuresinguidedjournaling.com
Adventures in Guided Journaling
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
kimondegreef.com
Kimon de Greef – Freelance journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
malkisomayah.com
Heimstätte – private journals
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
averyenthusiasticjournaler.com
A Very Enthusiastic Journaler
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
khbickell.com
The Memoir House - The Memoir House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.