Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chikakowade.com

Chikako Wade · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
albertdavenport.com
Albert Davenport – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
adrickbrock.com
Adrick Brock – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
atticusfarrow.com
Atticus Farrow
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
ebwagner.com
E. B. Wagner – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
juliewoodland.com
Julie Woodland | Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
75match
juliaridleysmith.com
Julia Ridley Smith – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
75match
lorrainejanderson.com
Lorraine J. Anderson | Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
alexharris.info
Alex Harris : Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
brucejohnsonfiction.com
Bruce Johnson – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
rebeccaroselangston.com
Rebecca Rose-Langston – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
louisehung.com
Louise Hung – Author. Writer.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
thaliahalloran.com
Thalia Halloran – Writer and Artist
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
alangrahamwords.com
Alan Graham - Home
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
animoscrypt.com
Irregular Bones | A Writer's Journal
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
juliadalexander.com
JuliaDAlexander | WiP: Writer in Progress
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
julzreads.com
JulzReads | Reader, Writer, Reviewer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
mrparlett.com
CHRIS PARLETT – WRITER | DINOSAUR | LOON
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
annknightfiction.com
Ann Knight Fiction - Home
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.