Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chefburns.com

Chef Burns | Private Chef · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
chefbindel.com
Chef Bindel | Private Chef
2 shared topicscooking
81match
chefrobprivatechef.com
Chef Rob Atlanta Private Chef
2 shared topicscooking
78match
chefronfan.com
Chef Ron Fan | Private Chef
2 shared topicscooking
77match
chefcharlieray.com
Chef Charlie Ray | private chef
2 shared topicscooking
77match
checinero.com
PRIVATE CHEF - Home
2 shared topicscooking
77match
chefdavidolson.com
David Olson | Private Chef
2 shared topicsfood-and-drink
76match
chefamiramarie.com
Chef Amira-Marie | private chef
2 shared topicscooking
76match
chef-bird.com
Private Chef
2 shared topicscooking
76match
khatiwada.dev
Vibhuti Cooks | Private Chef Services MD
2 shared topicscooking
76match
chefpiironen.com
Chef Piironen – Private Chef
2 shared topicsfood-and-drink
76match
chefezrashapiro.com
Chef Ezra Shapiro Pittsburgh | Private Chef Services
2 shared topicscooking
75match
chefjaneatscatering.com
Big Sky | Catering | Private Chef
2 shared topicsfood-and-drink
75match
chefdamoncooks.com
Private Chef | Chef Damon Cooks
2 shared topicscooking
75match
emmawhiteprivatechef.co.uk 🇬🇧
Emma White Private Chef
2 shared topicsfood-and-drink
74match
chefdiegoluis.com
Chef | Private Chef Diego Luis | United States
2 shared topicsfood-and-drink
74match
chefericwichita.com
Private Chef Wichita Ks
2 shared topicsfood-and-drink
74match
chefbrie.com
Chef Brie | private chef services
2 shared topicscooking
74match
chefisaacfriedman.com
Chef Isaac Friedman, Private Chef in NYC
2 shared topicsfood-and-drink

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.