Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chasebrook.com

News | Chase Brook Software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
andrewwerling.com
Andrew Werling - Technologist | Software Engineer | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
arnoldrestrepo.dev
Arnold Restrepo - Frontend Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
estebandevia.com
Estebabn Devia | Front end dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
kinzaigroup.com
Tech & Biz Dev Agency | Kinzai Group
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
paulgrotzke.com
Paul Grotzke | Software developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ammarakram.com
Ammar Akram - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ananttuli.com
Anant Tuli
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
malizhev.com
Bogdan Malizhev
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
nateeo.com
Nathan Hur
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
pedroalonsoms.com
pedroalonsoms - home
1 shared topicsweb-development
70match
nibbletech.co.uk 🇬🇧
NibbleTech · Shaun Walker PHP Contractor
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
simosoftware.com
SIMO Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
greenparksoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Green Park Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
desiresoftware.com
Desire Software
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
chaseisley.dev
Chase Isley — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
narinsun.com
NRS | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
narinrico.com
NRS | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
chaseterry.com
Chase Terry | Full-Stack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.