Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to charlesodale.com

Charles Writes : Charles O'Dale's blog. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
charlesmadere.com
charlesmadere (Charles Madere) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
charlielehnert.com
Charles Lehnert — Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
charlesui.dev
Charles UI
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
charlesata.dev
Charles Ata
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
charlesportwoodii.com
Erianna | Charles R. Portwood II - About
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
acksyn.org
Michele's Blog | Michele's Blog
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
charlesayere.com
Charles Ayere – Software Engineer & CTO
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
igorluchenkov.com
Igor's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bianjp.com
bianjp's Blog
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
1ittlecup.com
littlecup's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
charlesadeeko.com
Charles Adeeko — Director of Quality Engineering
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
paulpfeffer.com
Paul Pfeffer's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
napagoda.com
Chandana Napagoda's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
siyaochen.com
Siyao's Blog | 思尧的博客
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
betas.dev
Betas - Write, Ship, Fix.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
andriilazurenko.com
Typewriter
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
charlieluo.dev
Charlie Luo
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
textflowcharts.com
Text Flow Charts
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.