Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to chandraarthur.com

Chandra Arthur – Writer of books. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
galeadler.com
Gale Adler – Writer of YA Fantasy
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
ebwagner.com
E. B. Wagner – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
aawritess.com
Asia Ali – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
adrickbrock.com
Adrick Brock – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
albertdavenport.com
Albert Davenport – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
juliaridleysmith.com
Julia Ridley Smith – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
thaliahalloran.com
Thalia Halloran – Writer and Artist
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
alexcrenwick.com
Zandra Renwick – writer of fictions
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
patricialillie.com
Patricia Lillie – Writer & Designer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
paulaburkewrites.com
Paula Burke – writes
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
juliaortay.com
Julia Ortay – Author, Writer, Books, Stories
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
rebeccaroanhorse.com
Rebecca Roanhorse – WRITER Of SPECULATIVE FICTION & OTHER STUFF
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
gemmabrookwriter.com
Gemma L. Brook – Writer & Word Explorer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
mrparlett.com
CHRIS PARLETT – WRITER | DINOSAUR | LOON
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
paulneuhaus.com
PAUL NEUHAUS - writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
echunter.com
E C Hunter – Writer, thinker, cake eater
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
juliewoodland.com
Julie Woodland | Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
gentwennmo.com
Gent Wennmo – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.