similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to champ1foundation.com

Champ1Foundation alternatives & similar sites

CHAMP1 | The CHAMP1 Research Foundation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Children S Health →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
4efoundation.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	4E Foundation	US~ en	children-s-health Squarespace Squarespace Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
abonimarufoundation.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Home - AM Foundation	en	children-s-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samanthasmiles.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Samantha Smiles Foundation	en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddmcf.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - Dolores deMello Milho Charitable Foundation	en	children-s-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctcf-ck.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - Children's Treatment Centre Foundation	en	children-s-health WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avelafoundation.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Avela Foundation \| Helping Children With Burn Injuries	en	children-s-health WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
uschallengeteams.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	EPIC Challenge - St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital	en	children-s-health Adobe Experience Manager	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dickeyfamilyfoundation.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Branden and Jamie Dickey Family Foundation \| Helping Sick Children	en	children-s-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
feedingfoundationsst.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Feeding Foundations Speech Therapy \| London KY Feeding Therapy	US~ en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
feedthepeds.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Feed the Peds®: The Foundations of Pediatric Feeding and Swallowing	en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
faranehvarghakhadem.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Faraneh Vargha-Khadem \| Research, Clinical Practice, Consultancy	en	children-s-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3dlovesstjude.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Events for St. Jude \| St. Jude Children's Research Hospital	US~ en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronsforstjude.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Events for St. Jude \| St. Jude Children's Research Hospital	US~ en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abcrunchchallenge.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Events for St. Jude \| St. Jude Children's Research Hospital	US~ en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deborahblessfoundation.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Deborah Bless Foundation - EMPOWERING LIVES, FIGHTING MALNUTRITION, REDUCING CHILD MORTALITY	en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abramsnation.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Abram's Nation - Home of The Safety Sleeper® and More \| Abram's Nation	en	children-s-health Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
nataliebot.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Natalie B Paediatric Occupational Therapy	en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
planskool.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Vaccine Free Child	en	children-s-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.