Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ch4se.dev

Ch4se | Web Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
89match
alexanderwang.dev
Alexander Wang | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
jtreminio.com
Juan Treminio - Senior Web Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
bypanda.dev
byPandaDev - Fullstack Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
refif.dev
Refif Ilan | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
alexdepasquale.dev
Alex De Pasquale | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
simproch.dev
Simon Prochazka | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
jurajmarcin.com
Juraj Marcin - Programmer \ Web Developer \ Hobbyist Photographer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
mryujitanaka.com
Yuji Tanaka - Java Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
1benw.com
Ben Walker - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
reihanian.com
Iman Reihanian ─ developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
abhinavcodes.tech
Abhinav Anand | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
mumau.dev
Matt Mumau | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
andyhall.org
Andy Hall – Full Stack Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
fullstackcesar.com
César | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
gaurav-quasar.com
Gaurav Gupta | Full stack developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ashokj.app
Ashok J — Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
bunea.com
Razvan | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.