Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to cflynt.com

C Flynt · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
byaprilwilson.com
Home | April R. Wilson
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
astridfick.com
ASTRID FICK – Australian Literary Fiction Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
jsfletcher.com
Joseph Smith Fletcher | J.S. Fletcher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
andrewgforbes.com
Andrew Forbes | human author
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
ackoch.net
A.C. Koch - Fiction and stories
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
brucejohnsonfiction.com
Bruce Johnson – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
rebeccaroselangston.com
Rebecca Rose-Langston – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
ambermitchellbooks.com
Amber Mitchell – YA Author
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
ekariwrites.com
Ekari Writes
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
juniperwhiteauthor.com
Explore the Worlds of Juniper White – YA author
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
mrsleifs.com
MrsLeif's Two Fangs About It
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
acanderson.com
Aaron C. Anderson – An American author.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
corrinedalton.com
Corrine Dalton – Indie Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
craigbezant.com
HOME | Craig Bezant Crime Fiction Author and Editor
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
mskatutin.com
K. A. Tutin | Speculative Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
judealaska.com
Jude Alaska
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
juliagslater.com
Author Profile - Julia G. Slater
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
alariccabiling.net
ALARIC CABILING's OFFICIAL SITE – AUTHOR
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.