Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cflatmusic.com

cflat · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
72match
kylermello.com
Kyler Mello
9 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
72match
joekellymn.com
Joe Kelly
8 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
71match
joeholdermusic.com
Joe Holder
9 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
69match
genehadleymusic.com
Gene Hadley
8 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
68match
jlaasonen.com
Jussi Laasonen
8 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
68match
8onmusic.com
8ON
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
68match
dieknudsens.com
Die Knudsens
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
66match
juliehanney.com
Julie Hanney - Composer and Pianist
8 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryjazz
66match
bonjidude.com
bonji
8 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
66match
jacksollecito.com
Jack Sollecito
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
66match
joeterrormusic.com
Joe Terror
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorysongwriters-folk
66match
majormaq.com
Majormaq
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
66match
devroncreative.com
Devron Creative
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
65match
elijahkealy.com
Elijah Kealy
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
65match
jacksonheathmusic.com
Jackson Heath
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
65match
greatmaniacmusic.com
Maniacal J
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
65match
cerebraldesecration.com
Cerebral Desecration
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryrock-music
64match
janyboy.com
Janyboy
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.