Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to cetecom.com

Global market access for technology products | cetecom advanced · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
42match
hanktechnology.com
Hank Technology
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
42match
biztechpartner.com
Biz Tech Partner
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymanagement-consulting-industry
42match
michelleasp.com
Sr. Engineer / Technology Consultant
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
41match
metafacts.com
MetaFacts – Insights, market trends, and user profiles
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymarketing-and-advertising
39match
blocktecsolutions.com
Blocktecsolutions
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
39match
bitflexst.com
BITFLEX Strategy & Technology Partners
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
38match
diversitytechweek.org
2025 Diversity Tech Week |
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
38match
farinpour.com
Farinpour Advanced Technologies
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
38match
mindforge-tech.com
Mind Forge Technologies
1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
38match
alphaplasma-asia.com
Plasma Surface Technology
1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
38match
a1fed.com
Bridging the gap between technology and success | A1FED
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry
38match
naas-tech.com
NAAS Technologies
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorytechnology-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.