similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to ceslab.org

Ceslab alternatives & similar sites

CES-Lab - Computer and Embedded Systems Laboratory | ENIS University of Sfax — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
keenanbenning.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	KB's Mind \| Agentic & Distributed Systems, DeFi, and Compute Economics	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
henriquemlima.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Henrique Lima — Innovative Computer Engineer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
dataconversionlaboratory.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Data Conversion Laboratory \| Data & Content Transformations	en	technology-and-computing Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
espud.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	eSPUD — Embedded Special Projects for Utilitarian Devices	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heydatadude.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Data, AI, and Systems Thinking \| HeyDataDude	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gooddata.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	GoodData.AI \| AI-enabled, agentic, and embedded decision-making	United States~ en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erinakarati.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Erina Karati \| Applied AI Systems Builder	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dancramer.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Dan Cramer - software, culture, and systems	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apcoresystems.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	ApcoreSystems – Deep BIOS, firmware and Linux integration for deterministic embedded systems	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datastronomy.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Doug Sherk \| Notes on software engineering, ML, and systems work.	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
renatochu.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Renato Chu - Build smarter with AI systems and workflows	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
srikaryaganti.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Srikar Yaganti - CTO & AI Systems Engineer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barrysmyth.me ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Barry Smyth \| Professor of Computer Science – Entrepreneur – First-time Dad	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stackmind.io ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	StackMind \| AI Agentic Systems Research	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
danielchu.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Daniel Chu \| AI Systems and Product Notes	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stackforgelabs.dev ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Nithinraaj J \| Backend Engineer & Distributed Systems	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anatomyof.ai ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Anatomy of an AI System	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vitaliihonchar.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	High-Load Systems & AI Blog - Vitalii Honchar	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.