Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to cernera.dev

cernera.me · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
konkasidiaris.com
Kon's Internet Corner
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
moe-na.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
reubentomy.com
Reuben Tomy | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
ivanyu.dev
Ivan Yu
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
shogo-u.com
Your Name - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
sushensatturu.com
Sushen Satturu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
connordevitt.com
Connor Devitt - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andythelam.com
Andy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
gavinantonacci.com
Gavin Antonacci - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
madole.dev
Madole.xyz | Geospatial Web Apps & Portfolio of Andrew McDowell
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
annawaltrip.com
Anna Waltrip - Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
anujkarn.dev
Anuj Karn | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
itspranavbadgi.com
Pranav Badgi - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
rhefew.com
rhefew.com | Engineering Manager & Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewmagridev.com
Andrew Magri - FullStack Software Engineer Portfolio | Andrew Magri
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
itsashik.dev
Ashik Eqbal - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
itswaleed.com
Waleed's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ivanluna.dev
Iván Luna - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.