Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to celiafarran.com

Celia Farran · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
96match
celiasings.com
Celia Farran
8 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
96match
celiaonline.com
Celia Farran
8 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
73match
jaydadagostino.com
Jayda D'Agostino
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
72match
banasulman.com
Bana Sulman
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
71match
janyboy.com
Janyboy
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
69match
julielavery.com
Julie Lavery
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
69match
kelvernet.com
Kel Vernet
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
69match
mannytones.com
Manny Tones
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
69match
jarednels.com
Jared Nels
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
69match
jimmiejaspergray.com
Jimmie Jasper Gray
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryhip-hop-music
69match
elisagomeztaylor.com
Elisa Gomez Taylor
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryjazz
68match
mamaradical.com
Mama Radical
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
68match
marcbeasley.com
Marc Beasley
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorycountry-music
68match
marcesses.com
MESSES
6 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
68match
jacksonheathmusic.com
Jackson Heath
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
68match
jannikeofficial.com
Jannike
4 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
68match
jasminerain.com
jasmine rain
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
68match
jonneathan.com
Jon Neathan
5 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryclassical-music

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.