Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to celgen-cha.com

차의과학대학 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
25match
cbnuchemenergylab.com
Energy Conversion Metarial Lab
1 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categoryscience
23match
centrallifelab.com
중앙생명연구원
0 co-citations1 shared tech2 shared categorybiological-sciences
22match
hanascientific.com
하나과학(주)
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorychemistry
22match
ergservice.com
하나과학(주)
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorychemistry
20match
chavmd.com
전남대학교 CLVMD 연구실
0 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categoryphysics
20match
mareuda.com
주식회사 마르다
0 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorychemistry
19match
cerabuy.com
세라바이
1 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categorychemistry
19match
dgtimez.com
대경타임즈
1 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryweather
19match
diamantkorea.com
오정리질리언스
1 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryenvironment
18match
hangoyon.com
한고연
0 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categoryenvironment
18match
chemitop.com
케미탑
0 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categorychemistry
17match
envnews.com
환경수호운동연합회에 오신 것을 환영합니다.
1 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryenvironment
16match
kjtimes.com
kjtimes
1 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryweather
14match
ccscience.com
척척과학센터
1 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryscience
14match
changshin-lab.com
창신과학
0 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryscience
13match
majimak.com
Nuclear Physics | My External Brain!
0 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categoryphysics
12match
kyeonggiassetnews.com
경기자산뉴스
1 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categoryweather
12match
kentech-fusion.com
Nuclear Fusion
0 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categoryphysics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.