Piperic Business Intelligence

similar sites

Sites similar to celcea.com

celcea · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation

Adrianna Kusmierczyk

2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryfine-art

2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydigital-arts

georginahenry.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign

julianleighmay.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art

julianhaddad.com

Julian Haddad Design

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

ferranmayoral.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

mattitanskanen.com

Matti Tanskanen

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art-photography

juliagerritsen.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign

2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign

fernandanunez.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign

Mackenzie Henry

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art

bairballiet.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

celeiro-air.com

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art

coralgarvey.com

CoralGarveyWork2024

2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

co-citations how often the same third-party websites link out to both — sites referenced together tend to serve the same world.
shared tech how much of their technology stack (CMS, e‑commerce, analytics, frameworks…) overlaps.
shared category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
positioning how closely their titles and on‑page wording line up.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.