Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to ceejbot.com

Ceejbot · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
53match
copycatcassettes.com
Copy Cat Cassettes
5 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
52match
heyitsstag.com
StaG
6 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
52match
kylelanemusic.com
K Y L E
5 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
50match
janeblackmusic.com
JANE BLACK
4 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
50match
ektorpan.com
Ektor Pan Official
4 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
49match
boonesboro.com
Boonesboro
4 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
49match
elementperspective.com
elementperspective
5 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
48match
joeovertonmusic.com
Joe Overton
4 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
48match
elevatorteeth.com
E L E V A T O R T E E T H
4 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
48match
coucheronmusic.com
Coucheron
3 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
48match
bosaina.com
Bosaina
3 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
47match
barcelonemusic.com
Barcelone
4 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
47match
jasonmacemore.com
Jason Macemore
3 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryrock-music
47match
dianachiaki.com
DIANA CHIAKI
3 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
47match
greenadder.com
GreenAdder Dot Com
3 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
46match
jasonamazingmusic.com
Jason Amazing
2 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
46match
matsueri.com
△●□
2 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categorymusic
46match
breatheowlbreathe.com
BREATHE OWL BREATHE
2 co-citations7 shared tech1 shared categorymusic

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.